Blog

Pension Schemes Bill - LGPS amendments

calendar icon 13 April 2026
time icon 5 min

Author

Con Hargrave

Con Hargrave

Governance, Administration & Projects Consultant

We’ve been keeping a close eye on the Pension Schemes Bill as it’s made its way through Parliament the last few months, particularly given it’s the legislative vehicle for many of the government’s Fit for the Future reforms.  

There were a number of interesting LGPS developments during the House of Lords’ Report Stage. The Lords’ debated and passed three opposition and backbench amendments to the Bill relating to the LGPS sections, despite government opposition.

Amendments to the Bill 

  • Interim reviews of employer contributions – the amendment proposes changes to the LGPS Regulations 2013 to replace the existing provisions allowing for a review of employer contribution rates between valuations with new provisions, with an aim of making the process ‘more accessible and transparent’. 

  • Benchmarking of LGPS liabilities – the amendment proposes that, following each triennial valuation, the value of the liabilities used in local valuations should be benchmarked against the value of scheme liabilities on a ‘bulk annuity pricing’ basis and on a gilt-based discount rate basis, with explanations published where the LGPS funds had taken a materially more prudent approach. 

  • Limiting scope of investment regs – the amendment would prevent investment regulations made by the government requiring asset pooling by LGPS funds from making provision about funds investing in specific assets or asset classes, or about the location of the LGPS’s investments. 

The passing of the amendments is relatively unusual. Whilst the government does not have a majority in the House of Lords, often opposition and backbench amendments are just put forward to raise a point and to require government ministers to engage in discussion. What makes the situation here unusual is that the above amendments were ‘moved’ to a vote and the votes were then successful in getting through.

What does this mean in practice? 

It’s probably too early to say exactly. As the versions of the Bill passed by the Lords and by the Commons are different from each other, we will move to ‘ping-pong’ where the Bill bounces between the two Houses until both agree on the same version (although the Lords will often end up yielding to the Commons’ primacy after a few rounds). On 10 April 2026, the government confirmed its intent to oppose all the above amendments.  

What we do know though is that this will further delay the Bill receiving Royal Assent, and there is also the upcoming prorogation of Parliament ahead of the King’s Speech on 13 May 2026 to contend with (prorogation being a term many of us won’t have heard since the 2019 Brexit negotiations). Usually, all Bills must conclude their passage through Parliament before prorogation takes place, although there are measures to allow the government to carry bills over into a new parliamentary session, subject to certain criteria being met. 

Impact on implementation dates

The government have recently reacted to the delays by writing to LGPS administering authorities confirming their intent is to lay their Fit for the Future regulations as soon as possible once the Pension Schemes Bill receives Royal Assent. They have also adjusted some of the key implementation dates, in particular: 

  • The deadline for publication of the first investment strategy is expected to be extended to 31 March 2027. 

  • Where a fund is participating in a pool for the first time, the period within which assets must be under pool management has been extended to three months from the date of joining, and 

  • The deadline for LGPS administering authorities to appoint an LGPS senior officer and independent person is expected to be changed to 6 months from the date the regulations come into force. 

We would not expect regulations to be made now before the local elections on 7 May. In addition, 21 days must usually pass before made regulations come into force. This would all appear to suggest that the earliest scheme regulations could come into force would be 1 June, a date which would mean a 30 November deadline for the appointment of a senior LGPS officer and independent person. However, as we have seen, delays happen and it wouldn’t take much for the new deadlines to fall into 2027. The timing of the regulations will no doubt be something that LGPS funds across England and Wales will continue to be paying close attention to. 

If you would like to discuss anything further with us, please get in touch. 

Sign up for our newsletter

We pride ourselves on being thought leaders and are constantly discussing the many issues facing and shaping our industry. Sign up to find our current thinking on topical issues.

Opens in new window Subscribe
  • Latest industry news

  • First access to upcoming events

  • Content tailored to your interests

  • Access to exclusive content

Opens in new window Subscribe