As London Climate Action Week got underway, we joined the Reset Connect conference, which brought together sustainability leaders, innovators and decision-makers to address climate change and drive impactful transformation. Here are some of the key highlights we took from the day. Our Biodiversity Lead, André Ranchin, also contributed his views in two insightful talks on issues impacting the ocean and marine biodiversity.
Nature takes centre stage
This year’s United Nations Conference of the Parties (COP) meeting will be held in Belém, Brazil, on the Amazon delta. A main theme will be preserving forests and biodiversity. Our economic system is dependent on the natural ecosystem in which it operates, and the increasing stress on natural ecosystems introduces material financial risk for businesses.
Oceans and water systems are taken for granted
Despite being the Earth’s support system and one of the greatest assets in fighting against climate change, absorbing half of global emissions, oceans have been overlooked to date in climate discussions. Seagrass and kelp offer effective means of absorbing carbon, but there are multiple threats to ocean health. Overexploitation of fish populations and land-based pollution point to the need for meaningful regulation and innovation to reduce damaging activity while meeting growing global food demands. Asset owners should consider including ocean and marine biodiversity in investment policies, assess portfolios’ risk exposure, and engage with asset managers and portfolio companies on this important issue.
Environmental risks remain mispriced
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) has become a politicised term, yet prudent risk management is increasingly important. This year we saw record losses due to the winter’s wildfires in California, in areas with no or low insurance coverage. Despite this risk, properties in Los Angeles County were some of the most expensive in the world – highlighting both the mispricing of risk in markets and the lack of adequate adaptation and readiness for extreme weather.
Climate transition plans must become standard
While regulatory support for environmental regulation has softened, litigation risk should incentivise company boards to pay attention to material risks. Companies are increasingly aware of the need to identify and manage risks relating to their businesses. Transition plans are an important means of recognising risk and taking the necessary steps to adapt. Companies must establish plans to identify and manage risk, and asset managers should assess the quality and feasibility of these, holding management to account in improving and implementing them. We encourage asset owners to develop and publish climate transition plans and policies that support their long-term objectives in taking meaningful steps to manage environmental risk.
Investing in the transition
Climate change poses a myriad of problems for businesses and society. As investment can help to solve real-world challenges, we see opportunities across asset classes, from assessing and navigating risk to identifying emerging technologies. While many solutions for net zero exist already (many requiring scaling), further innovation is needed. With an end to low interest rates, scaling businesses is more challenging, but costs for novel technologies are falling. Market forces can drive the transition to low-carbon technologies such as renewable energy infrastructure and electric vehicles.
Stewardship should be aligned with expectations on policy change
Long-term investors are most exposed to risks that may materialise over long time horizons. Their role as asset owners is vital in creating accountability for company management and encouraging sustainable value creation. Their focus should, therefore, be on establishing expectations and objectives for the asset managers they appoint, supporting concerted effort to advocate for policy that shapes incentives in our economy, and ensuring alignment between these and manager activity.
Disclosures must evolve
New disclosure frameworks have brought greater attention to environmental risk, but these are not harmonised and not manageable for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). This means information on emissions and climate-related risk across supply chains is still lacking. Greater discussion is required on what SMEs can produce with the resources available to them, and what lenders require from them to understand and price risk.
Download PDF version
If you have any questions or would like to discuss things further, please get in touch.