• Jump to main content
  • Jump to main navigation
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Media Centre
  • Contact
  • The Brain
Hymans Robertson
  • Pensions
    • Back to Main Menu
    • Defined Benefit Consulting
      • DB Actuarial
      • DB Investment
      • DB Pensions Administration
      • DB Risk Transfer
      • DB Member Choice – At retirement
      • DB Governance
      • DB Consolidation
      • DB Wind-up
      • DB Endgame Strategy
      • Expert Actuarial Services
      • Fiduciary Oversight
      • Climate Change Services
      • Responsible Investment
      • Project Planning and Management
    • Defined Contribution Consulting
      • DC Pension Strategy
      • DC Scheme Structure
      • DC Investment
      • DC Engagement
      • DC Member Choice - At-retirement
      • DC Governance
      • Guided Outcomes
      • DC Master Trusts
      • Benefits and Rewards Strategy
      • Project Planning and Management
      • Climate Change Services
      • Responsible Investment
      • Communications
    • Public Sector Consulting
      • LGPS Actuarial
      • LGPS Investment
      • LGPS Governance, Administration and Projects
      • LGPS Employers
      • LGPS Online Learning Academy
      • Ill Health Liability Insurance
      • Climate Change Services
      • Responsible Investment
  • Financial Services
    • Back to Main Menu
    • Insurance
      • Longevity Management
      • Product Development
      • Risk and Capital Management
      • Investment and ALM
      • Property and Casualty
      • Regulated Roles
      • Insurance Transactions
      • Project Planning and Management
    • HRIS
      • Tailored Portfolio Service
    • Pension Providers
      • Digital Tools and APIs
      • Competitive Benchmarking
      • Proposition development
      • Operational Support
    • Digital Wealth
      • GO™ For Investment Pathways
      • Economic Scenario Service
      • API Catalogue
      • Strategic Asset Allocation
  • Digital & Innovation
    • Back to Main Menu
    • Digital & Innovation
      • API Catalogue
      • Economic Scenario Service
      • Digital Products
      • PRISM - Digital Pension Administration
    • Economic Scenario Service
      Explore the consequences of today's business decisions
    • Digital and Innovation
      We apply data science, technology expertise and innovation to help our clients build a better financial future.
  • Insights
    • Back to Main Menu
    • See all Insights
      • Webinars
      • Podcasts
      • Research and Publications
      • Blogs
      • Case studies
      • Press Releases
      • Events
    • Webinars
      Register for upcoming webinars as well as visiting our extensive webinar replay library.
    • All Insights
      See our latest thinking.
  • Team
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Media Centre
  • Contact
  • The Brain
  • Search

Our website uses cookies (what’s this?). These cookies allow us to distinguish you from other users of our website, which helps us improve our website and to deliver many of the functions that make your browser experience more user-friendly. Some of the cookies that we use are essential for parts of the website to operate. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, including how to opt out, please read our Cookies Policy.

OK

Blog

Cognitive bias as a barrier to tackling climate change

16 Jun 2022

Nicola Kenyon

by Nicola Kenyon
Head of Insurance Innovation & Change

Scott McGruther-Johnson

by Scott McGruther-Johnson
Consulting Actuary

Amy  Sutherland

by Amy Sutherland
Climate Change Associate Consultant

Subject: Climate change, Insurance & Reinsurance

Audiences: Insurance & Financial Services

There is growing concern among activist groups and across the public that companies will not react quickly enough to mitigate the effects of climate change and reach the agreed targets of the Paris agreement. As regulation and general cultural trends head more towards a net-zero world, this raises the question of why some companies and investors may be slower to react than others. In this blog, we focus on some of the underpinning psychology for this and how we can use this knowledge to identify biases in facilitating the journey to net-zero.

Cognitive bias is a systematic error in thinking. The human brain has a predisposition to perceive information through a filter of personal experience and preferences and therefore ‘rational’ decisions may be overlooked in favour of more familiar or automatic thinking. When taken in the context of climate change this means that an individual may not perceive the true risks of climate change and therefore what is required to mitigate them.

While informative, this definition doesn’t initially help us to tackle the problem as it is not cost effective to attempt personalised education on a societal scale. Therefore, it is useful instead to understand and teach how human psychology influences decision-making on an unconscious level to empower individuals in observing and mitigating their inherent biases, as well as helping others to do the same. The figure below gives some examples of biased thinking; the interaction of these psychological mechanisms creating the overall phenomenon of cognitive bias.

Short-term thinking plays an element here as well. People tend to only consider short, more conceivable timeframes and immediate issues, which can lead to struggles in planning for the longer term. This often means that solutions can be overlooked or delayed as quicker, but less effective, measures are used instead. While these temporary solutions may appeal, they can often have longer term impacts and delay the real fixes. This is a major concern with climate change as a compounding, multi-faceted problem.

As solutions to climate change and the risks associated with it are often long-term in nature, short-term thinking struggles to address either sufficiently. This combined with individuals’ underlying biases on climate change, its impacts, and the timeframe to react makes this a complex issue to unravel. Our actuarial work may be focused on analysing and interpreting underlying data, navigating potential biased thinking, and using this to monitor and manage risks. However, it also requires an understanding of human psychology to support real change.

Biased thinking can be difficult to avoid, but taking the time to acknowledge and analyse these thought processes gives us the opportunity to challenge them, find alternative solutions and more adequately cover the risks involved. To support this (and diversify ideas) alternative views and opinions should be sought out where possible.

Open communication and sharing of knowledge and ideas between firms is also going to play a large part in targeting climate change risks and meeting regulatory requirements across the industry. Open and transparent discussions in this area are key to ensuring information is spread quickly, allowing ideas and solutions to develop and a unified approach to be reached.

Individuals often want to avoid the issue of climate change as it can seem too negative of a topic with no actionable solutions. Therefore, being aware of these initial biases and finding a positive spin or attractive viewpoint will help to start these conversations off on the right foot. By approaching the topic as something to find opportunity in, rather than something that needs to be fixed, you may gain a better understanding of the leverage you have in generating impact.

At Hymans Robertson we make a conscious effort to identify and tackle our own biases as well as helping our clients do likewise – hosting internal presentations on the impacts of bias allowing our teams to be more aware of their own thought processes when tackling problems. Maintaining awareness of potential bias and continuously working to challenge them allows us to provide our clients with fully thought-out solutions free from our individual preference or influence. We have also provided similar training to clients, enabling them to challenge their own biases and embrace cognitive diversity and its potential.

The aim here isn’t to use psychology to change the minds of our clients to our way of thinking but instead to give them the chance to consider and take note of other options that may otherwise have passed them by. We acknowledge that care should be taken when having these conversations to make sure that biases are not influencing the discussion and that dialogue is open, friendly and positive.

Below are some cross-industry talking points that you may find helpful to start with in challenging your own potential bias and how it may pertain to climate change.

Subscribe to our news and insights

Related content

Current Issues - July 2022

Publications 01 Jul 2022

SEC consultation response

Publications 24 Jun 2022

Just transition and good work

Publications 21 Jun 2022

Richard Stock appointed Head of Property and Casualty

News 16 Jun 2022

0 comments on this post

Comment

  • Share this via Twitter
  • Share this via Linkedin
  • Share this via Email
Related content
Close related articles

Current Issues - July 2022

Publications

SEC consultation response

Publications

Just transition and good work

Publications

Richard Stock appointed Head of Property and Casualty

News

Subscribe to our news and insights

Menu

About

    • Abelica Global
    • About us
    • Award-winning advice
    • Careers
    • CSR
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Our Centenary

Legal

  • Accessibility
  • Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement
  • Trust centre
  • Privacy notice
  • Terms of use

Resources

  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
  • Responsible Investment
  • Gender Pay Gap
  • Sitemap

Contact

  • Our offices
  • Get in touch
  • Subscribe
    • Visit us on Linkedin
    • Visit us on Twitter
    • Visit us on Instagram
    • Visit us on Vimeo
    • Visit us on Spreaker
Hymans Robertson

Copyright © 2022 Hymans Robertson LLP. All rights reserved.