• Jump to main content
  • Jump to main navigation
Hymans Robertson
  • Search
  • Visit us on Linkedin
  • Visit us on Twitter
  • Workplace Pensions, Investments, Employee Benefits & Risk Management
  • News and Insights
    • All
    • News and Blogs
    • Events
    • Research and Publications
    • Case studies
  • Why Hymans?
    • Why work with Hymans?
    • Who we work with
    • Independent, award-winning advice
    • Abelica Global
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Pensions
    • Investment Consulting
    • Insurance
    • Technology
    • Digital Wealth
  • Team
  • Careers
    • Welcome
    • Our Practice Areas
    • Student Opportunities
    • Experienced Opportunities
    • Careers Blog
  • Contact
    • Contact us
    • Our offices
    • Get in touch
  • The Brain
  • Visit us on Linkedin
  • Visit us on Twitter

Our website uses cookies (what’s this?). These cookies allow us to distinguish you from other users of our website, which helps us improve our website and to deliver many of the functions that make your browser experience more user-friendly. Some of the cookies that we use are essential for parts of the website to operate. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, including how to opt out, please read our Cookies Policy.

OK
  • All
  • News and Blogs
  • Events
  • Research and Publications
  • Case studies
Blog

Fiduciary management does not mean buy-and-hold

04 Feb 2019

Mark Baker

by Mark Baker
Head of Fiduciary Oversight

Subject: Defined benefit pensions, Investments & Capital Markets

Audiences: Employers, Trustees

In many (if not most) cases fiduciary management is effectively an asset management solution, either a fund of funds or a multi-asset offering including asset allocation. That puts fiduciary managers directly in competition with all other asset managers (of which there are many) providing such services. 

We all know that fees are a fundamental issue for pension schemes, and duplication or the payment of unnecessary fees is something all trustees should address. I don’t want to get involved in the debate about the level of fiduciary fees here, but there is an important issue which merits (indeed requires) trustees’ attention.

The key point to recognise is the increasing maturity of schemes and the move away from growth assets to income and protection assets. This makes strategic sense as the need to generate income and avoid being a forced seller of assets becomes of crucial importance, while protection is also required against adverse balance sheet impacts caused by movements in yields. 

The issue is that income assets are held for their contractual cashflow characteristics, including the repayment of capital at the end of the term. As a result, income assets are often buy-and-hold assets, and the need for an asset manager is in the selection of the underlying credits. Unless something goes wrong, the asset will be held to maturity with proceeds paid away to meet scheme cashflow. So there is a need to delegate to an underlying credit selector, but not to pay an additional layer of fees for someone to duplicate that role.

The same applies with LDI portfolios. Employing an expert to implement the agreed strategy, and to actively manage components of it, is appropriate. But paying an additional layer of asset management fees on top of that is neither necessary nor advisable.

So while increasing maturity means trustees have greater need for buy-and-hold strategies, they should increasingly recognise that they don’t need to double up fees with a buy-and-hold fiduciary.

Subscribe to receive our latest news and insights

Related content

Trustees’ responsibilities under fiduciary management

Blogs 21 Nov 2018

Investment Perspectives Autumn 2018

Publications 08 Nov 2018

Flash Stats Q4 2018

Publications 09 Jan 2019

Sixty second summary - Stronger Regulator to protect DB schemes

Publications 14 Feb 2019

0 comments on this post

Comment

  • Share this via Twitter
  • Share this via Linkedin
  • Share this via Email
Related content
Close related articles

Trustees’ responsibilities under fiduciary management

Blogs

Investment Perspectives Autumn 2018

Publications

Flash Stats Q4 2018

Publications

Sixty second summary - Stronger Regulator to protect DB schemes

Publications
Menu
  • Privacy notice
  • Subscribe
  • Modern Slavery Statement
  • Trust Centre
  • Gender Pay Gap
  • Brexit
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility
  • Site map

    Subscribe to our news and insights.

    Hymans Robertson

    Copyright © 2019 Hymans Robertson LLP. All rights reserved.